Exploring the pros and cons of injection moulding and vacuum casting for low volume production runs
In the world of manufacturing, two popular techniques often considered by engineers and designers are vacuum casting and injection moulding. Depending on project requirements, these methods offer different benefits and may serve various purposes. By exploring the strengths and limitations of vacuum casting and injection moulding, you can make a more informed decision for your production line.
Vacuum Casting – an Overview
Vacuum casting involves pouring liquid polyurethane into a silicone mould, which cures into a solid part. The master pattern for this mould is normally created using 3D printing or CNC machining, and can carry fine detailing. This method is widely appreciated for its quick turnaround times and is ideal for low-to medium-volume production runs. A tool or mould will typically deliver between 25 and 50 parts without compromising the end part.
Advantages of Vacuum Casting:
- Speed: You can move rapidly from design to finished product with vacuum casting.
- Cost Efficiency: It is a cost-effective solution, especially for small production batches.
- Detail and Surface Finish: The process can replicate intricate details and deliver high-quality surface finishes.
- Material Varieties: It accommodates a wide range of material options, including different colours and levels of hardness or flexibility.
Injection Moulding – an Overview
Injection moulding involves melting plastic pellets and injecting the molten plastic into a steel or aluminium mould under high pressure. This process suits high-volume production and can efficiently produce a massive quantity of consistent parts.
Advantages of Injection Moulding:
- High Efficiency: Ideal for large-scale production, injection molding can produce thousands to millions of parts.
- Strength and Durability: Due to the nature of the materials and process, parts are typically more robust and durable.
- Lower Part Cost at Volume: Although initial costs are high, the per-part cost decreases significantly as volume increases.
- Precision: Injection molding can achieve tight tolerances and maintain consistent part quality.
Key Differences Between Vacuum Casting and Injection Moulding
- Prototyping vs. Mass Production: Vacuum casting is perfect for prototyping or smaller runs, whereas injection moulding is more suitable for mass production. It should be noted that there are opportunities for prototyping and low volume production runs with injection moulding. Quickparts offers prototype tooling to 2,500 parts from aluminium, which does have limitations on materials and part complexity, but nevertheless overcomes the material limitations of vacuum casting.
- Tooling Costs: Silicone moulds used in vacuum casting are cheaper to produce than the metal moulds needed for injection moulding. Silicone mould life is, however, considerably shorter than that of an aluminium or steel tool.
- Lead Times: Vacuum casting has shorter lead times than injection moulding, which requires more time to create the tooling.
- Material Versatility: Vacuum casting offers less flexibility in material choice and colour options. Typically, vacuum casting materials are regarded as ‘simulants’ of injection moulding materials and many do not have the heat or chemical resistance of injection moulding polymers such as ABS and polycarbonate.
Choosing the Right Process for Your Project
When deciding between vacuum casting and injection molding, consider the following factors:
- Production Volume: Evaluate the quantity of parts needed. Low to medium? Vacuum casting might be your best bet. High volume? Injection moulding is the way to go.
- Budget Constraints: If you’re conscious about upfront costs, vacuum casting offers a lower barrier to entry compared to the significant investment required for injection moulding tooling.
- Design Flexibility: If you anticipate design changes, vacuum casting provides the adaptability you need with minimal financial impact.
Both are Useful
Both vacuum casting and injection moulding have a place in the manufacturing ecosystem, each offering unique advantages. By considering your project’s needs, whether it’s flexibility, cost, volume, or materials, you can select the process that best aligns with your goals. Understanding the subtleties of each method allows for smarter decisions that can save time and resources and ultimately lead to a better final product.
Request a Project Quote Today
For engineers seeking to optimise their manufacturing processes for low to mid-volume runs, the choice between vacuum casting and injection moulding is a critical one. Both techniques offer unique advantages and limitations, and the best choice will depend on specific project requirements. Our highly experienced engineers can help inform your decision by exploring with you factors such as part complexity, material properties, production volume, and cost, and their effects on manufacturability and part quality.
