Why SLS Still Holds Its Own in Automotive Manufacturing
This prototype door card was created for Stellantis using SLS 3D printing. Leather and other finishing techniques were included afterwards.
In the fast-evolving world of automotive manufacturing, the spotlight often swings toward the newest technologies and flashiest breakthroughs. But amid the noise, one additive manufacturing process continues to deliver quietly and consistently: Selective Laser Sintering (SLS). For automotive teams focused on performance, reliability, and end-use quality, SLS remains a staple — not a stopgap.
Beyond the Hype: What Makes SLS Worthwhile?
Let’s skip the basics. If you’re working in automotive, you already know that SLS uses a laser to fuse polymer powders layer by layer, without support structures. But what keeps SLS relevant today — especially when Multi Jet Fusion (MJF) and other polymer AM technologies are making waves?
It comes down to material versatility, thermal performance, and design robustness — particularly when you’re dealing with small-to-medium production runs, under-bonnet applications, or interior components that need to withstand harsh conditions.
Where SLS Delivers — And Why It Matters
- Real Material Muscle
Quickparts supports SLS with a range of materials tailored for automotive needs, including:
- DuraForm PA: Tough and lightweight — ideal for enclosures, brackets, and functional interior components.
- DuraForm GF (Glass-Filled): Enhanced stiffness and thermal resistance — excellent for parts exposed to engine bay temperatures or high mechanical stress.
- DuraForm HST: High-temperature nylon composite — a go-to for ducting, heat shields, and under-hood airflow components.
- TPU (Thermoplastic Polyurethane): Flexible and resilient — for grommets, bellows, or vibration-damping elements.
- DuraForm EX White / EX Black: Higher impact resistance and excellent surface finish — great for visible parts or when post-processing matters.
These materials aren’t just “good enough.” They’re being used to replace metal in some non-structural applications, reduce part counts, and simplify complex assemblies — without compromising on durability or heat resistance.
- Functional Prototypes and Beyond
For most OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers, prototyping is just the beginning. SLS parts are increasingly used for low-volume production — especially for EV startups, motorsport teams, and specialty vehicle builds where tooling costs are a non-starter. Cable routing clips, HVAC ducting, and fluid reservoirs are just a few examples of functional components being run in production via SLS. - Repeatability and Surface Quality
Compared to MJF, SLS offers better isotropic mechanical properties and, with the right post-processing, superior surface finish — especially important for visible or tactile components. Where MJF has speed and color options, SLS offers higher heat deflection, finer detail in Z-axis builds, and broader powder compatibility.
Advantages of SLS 3D printing in automotive manufacturing – a summary
- Cost efficiency: By eliminating material waste as well as reducing the requirement for tooling, SLS deliver significant cost savings in production.
- Design freedom: SLS enables the creation of complex geometries that are difficult or impossible to achieve with conventional manufacturing methods.
- Enhanced performance: SLS-printed parts showcase excellent mechanical properties, including high strength-to-weight ratios, durability and thermal resistance.
- Sustainability: the additive feature of SLS eliminates material waste and energy consumption, aligning with the automotive industry’s sustainability goals.
- Shorter lead times: The rapid production capabilities of SLS help manufacturers bring products to market quicker, giving them a competitive edge.
Where MJF (Sometimes) Wins
Let’s be honest: MJF does have advantages. It’s faster for certain part geometries and offers smoother surfaces straight out of the printer. But when it comes to engineering-grade nylons, high-temp performance, and structural strength, SLS still leads — especially for parts that need to withstand automotive testing protocols.
The Road Ahead
As additive manufacturing continues to mature, the conversation is shifting from “Can we print this?” to “What’s the best process for the job?” SLS remains a top contender — especially for applications demanding material performance, geometric freedom, and repeatability.
And with ongoing improvements in automation, powder reuse, and printer throughput, SLS is evolving to meet not just prototyping needs, but real production challenges — including lightweighting, sustainability targets, and rapid supply chain reactivity.
FAQs About SLS 3D Printing in the Automotive Industry
Q1. What types of materials are used in SLS 3D printing for automotive applications? A1. Materials such as nylon (PA11, PA12), glass-filled nylon, carbon-fiber-reinforced nylon, and other advanced composites are frequently used in SLS because they are strong, durable, and lightweight, making them ideal for automotive components.
Q2. How does SLS 3D printing contribute to vehicle weight reduction? A2. SLS makes it possible to produce lightweight parts with cutting-edge materials that preserve strength and functionality while lowering total weight. This is especially advantageous for increasing electric car range and fuel economy.
Q3. Can SLS 3D printing be used for mass production in the automotive industry? A3. Yes, low- to medium-volume production runs are increasingly using SLS. It is a good option for some mass production applications because of its speedy manufacture of intricate, high-quality parts.
Q4. What is the role of SLS 3D printing in automotive spare parts production? A4. SLS makes it possible to produce spare parts on demand, which lowers lead times and inventory costs. This is particularly helpful for discontinued or uncommon car models where it can be challenging to find traditional spare parts.
Reference:
